| Top UNL Expression Relations Attributes Universal Words UNLKB Knowledge Representation in UNL Logical Expression in UNL UNL System |
|
|

UNL 2005 Specifications
7 June 2005
Copyright © UNL Center of UNDL Foundation
Attributes are mainly for the purpose
to describe the subjectivity information of sentences. They show what is said
from the speaker’s point of view: how the speaker views what is said. This
includes phenomena technically called “speech acts”, “propositional
attitudes”, “truth values”, etc.
Attributes
are also used to express the range of concepts such as the concept indicate
generic type of concept and so forth. This time, we newly introduce attributes
to express logical expressions in order to strengthen the expressibility of the
UNL.
Relations and UWs are used to describe the objectivity information of sentences. Attributes modify UWs or semantic networks (scope: compound concepts) to indicate subjectivity information such as about how the speaker views these states-of-affairs and his attitudes toward them and to indicate the property of the concepts.
Attributes are divided into the following eight groups:
In UNL2005, we introduced new
attributes to express logical expressions in order to strengthen the
expressibility of the UNL although the role of those attribute can be expressed
by using UWs as ordinal UNL expressions. In
this section, we focus on describing attributes and relations for expressing
logic.
| @transitive | attached to an UW that has transitivity |
| '@transitive’ can be attached to UW ‘ancestor(icl>kindred)’.
Because if “A is ancestor of B” and “B is ancestor of C” are
true, “A is ancestor of C” will be true. |
|
| @symmetric | attached to an UW that has symmetricity |
| ‘@symmetric’ can be attached to UW ‘partner(icl>....)’. Because if “A is a partner of B” is true, “B is a partner of A” will be true also. | |
| @identifiable | attached to an UW that can identify the subject |
| ‘@identifiable’ can be attached to (compound) UW
‘national health insurance id’ as the content of the UW can identify
the person who hold the ID. |
|
| @disjointed | attached to an UW or a group of UWs to show that all element concept do not hold common instance. All connected UWs do not share instances. |
| ‘@disjointed’ can be attached to a scope consists of
“men and women” as these two element concepts do not share common
instances. |
Where does
the speaker situate his description in time, taking his moment of speaking as a
point of reference? A time before he spoke? After? At approximately the same
time? This is the information that defines “narrative time” as past, present
or future. These Attributes are attached to the main predicate.
Although in
many languages this information is signaled by tense markings on verbs, the
concept is not tense, but “time with respect to the speaker”. The clearest
example is the simple present tense in English, which is not interpreted as the
present time, but as “independently of specific times”.
Consider the example: The earth is round.
This
sentence is true in the past, present and future, independently of the
speaker’s time, so although the tense is “present” it is not interpreted
as the present time.
| @past | happened in the past |
| ex) It was snowing yesterday | |
| @present | happening at present |
| ex) It is raining hard. | |
| @future | will happen in future |
| ex) He will arrive tomorrow |
A
speaker can emphasize or focus on part of an event or treat it as a whole unit.
This is closely linked to how the speaker places the event in time. These
Attributes are attached to the main predicate.
The speaker can focus on the beginning (@begin) of the event, looking
forward to it (@begin.@soon), or backward to it (@begin.@just).
He can also focus on the end (@end) or completion (@complete) of the
event, looking forward to it (@end.@soon or @complete.@soon), or backward to it
(@end.@just or @complete.@just).
He can focus on the middle (@progress) or continuation (@continue) of the
event.
The speaker can choose to focus on the lasting effects or final state of
the event (@state) or on the event as a repeating unit (@repeat), experience
(@experience) or custom (@custom).
He can also focus on the incompleteness or the fact that it has not yet
happened, by using @yet.
| @begin | beginning of an event or a state |
| ex) It began to work again | |
| @complete | finishing/completion of a (whole) event |
| ex) I've looked through
the script. look.@entry.@complete |
|
| @continue | continuation of an event |
| ex) He went on talking. talk.@continue.@past |
|
| @custom | customary or repetitious action |
| ex) I used to visit [I
would often go] there when I was a boy. visit.@custom.@past |
|
| @end | end/termination
of an event or a state |
| ex) I have done it. do.@end.@present |
|
| @experience | experience |
| ex) Have you ever
visited Japan? visit.@experience.@interrogation ex) I have been there. visit.@exterience |
|
| @progress | an event is in progress |
| ex) I am working now. work.@progress.@present |
|
| @repeat | repetition of an event |
| ex) It is so windy that
the tree branches are knocking against the roof. knock.@entry.@present.@repeat |
|
| @state | final state or the existence of the object on which an action has been taken |
| ex) It is broken. break.@state |
These attributes are used to modify the attributes above, to express a variety of aspects of natural languages.
| @just | Expresses an event or a state that has just begun or ended/completed |
| Ex) He has just come. come.@complete.@just |
|
| @soon | Expresses an event or a state that is about to begin or end/completed |
| Ex) The train is about
to leave. leave.@begin.@soon |
|
| @yet | Expresses an event or a state that has not yet started or ended/completed, together with @not |
| Ex) I have not yet done
it. do.@complete.@not.@yet |
Whether an expression refers to a single
individual, a small group or a whole set is often not clear. The expression
“the lion” is not sufficiently explicit for us to know whether the speaker
means “one particular lion” or “all lions”.
Consider the following examples:
The lion is a feline mammal.
The lion is eating an antelope.
In the first example, it seems reasonable to suppose that the speaker understood
“the lion” as “all lions”, whereas in the second example as “one
particular lion”.
The following Attributes are used to make explicit
what the speaker’s view of reference seems to be.
| @generic | generic concept |
| ex) The dog is a faithful animal. | |
| @def | already referred |
| ex) the book you lost | |
| @indef | non-specific class |
| ex) There is a book on the desk. | |
| @not | complement set |
| ex) Don’t be late! | |
| @ordinal | ordinal number |
| ex) the 2nd door |
These attributes are usually attached to UWs that denote things.
The speaker can choose to focus or emphasize parts of a sentence to show how important he thinks they are in the situation described. This is often related to sentence structure. One UW marked with "@entry" is essential for each UNL expression or in a Compound UW.
| @contrast | Contrasted UW |
| For
instance, “but” in the examples below is used to introduce a word or
phrase that contrasts with what was said before. ex) It wasn’t the red one but the blue one. ex) He’s poor but happy |
|
| @emphasis | Emphasized UW |
| ex) I do like it. | |
| @entry | Entry or main UW of a sentence or a scope |
| ex) He promised (entry of the sentence) that he would come (entry of the scope) | |
| @qfocus | Focused UW of a question |
| ex) Are you
painting the bathroom blue? To this question, the answer will be “No, I’m painting the LIVING-ROOM blue” |
|
| @theme | Instantiates an object from a different class |
| @title | Title |
| @topic | Topic |
| ex)
He(@topic) was killed by her. ex) The girl(@topic) was given a doll. ex) This doll(@topic) was given to the girl. |
The speaker can also express, directly or indirectly, what his attitudes or emotions are towards what is being said or whom it is being said to. This includes respect and politeness towards the listener and surprise toward what is being said.
| @affirmative | Affirmation |
| @confirmation | Confirmation |
|
ex)
You won't say that, will you? |
|
| @exclamation | Exclamation |
| ex) kirei
na! (“How beautiful (it is)!” in Japanese) ex) Oh, look out! |
|
| @humility | In a humility manner |
| ex) That is quite impossible for the likes of me.@humility. | |
| @imperative | Imperative |
| ex) Get up! ex) You will please leave the room. |
|
| @interrogative | Interrogation |
| ex) Who is it? | |
| @invitation | Inducement |
| ex) Will /
Won’t you have some tea? ex) Let’s go, shall we? |
|
| @polite | polite way |
| ex) Could
you (please)... ex) If you could … I would … |
|
| @request | Request |
| ex) Please don’t forget… | |
| @respect | Respectful way |
| ex) o taku
(“(your) house” in Japanese) ex) Good morning, sir. |
|
| @vocative | Vocative |
| ex) Boys, be ambitious! |
These attributes express the speaker’s
feelings or how the speaker views or judges what is said.
This sort of subjective information is
very much dependent on the type of language. It should be possible to express
every kind of subjective information from all languages. Thus, the development
of the attributes is open to the developers of each language, who can introduce
a new attribute when no current attribute expresses its meaning. The new
attribute must be also introduced in the same way.
ABILITY
| @ability | Ability, capability of doing something |
|
ex)
The child can 't walk yet. |
BENEFICIALTY
| @get-benefit | Speaker’s feeling of receiving benefits through the fact or result of something (to be) done by somebody else |
|
ex) I'll
have my secretary type the letter. |
|
| @give-benefit | Speaker’s feeling of giving benefits by doing something for somebody else |
|
ex) Be kind to old people. |
CONCLUSION
| @conclusion | Logical conclusion due to a certain condition |
| ex) He is her husband; she is his wife. | |
| @consequence | Logical consequence |
| ex) He was angry, wherefore I left him alone. |
CONDITION
| @sufficient | Sufficient condition |
| ex) only have to |
CONSENT / DISSENT
| @consent | Consent feeling of the speaker about something |
| @dissent | Dissent feeling of the speaker about something |
| ex) But that’s not true. | |
| @grant | To give/get consent/permission to do something |
| ex)
Can I smoke in here? ex) You may borrow my car if you like. |
|
| @grant-not | Not to give consent to do something |
| ex) You {mustn't/are not allowed to/may not} borrow my car. |
EXPECTATION
| @although | Something follows against [contrary to] or beyond expectation |
| ex) Although he didn't speak, I felt a certain warmth in his manner. | |
| @discontented | Discontented feeling of the speaker about something |
|
ex) (I'll tip you 10 pence.) But that's not enough! |
|
| @expectation | Expectation of something |
|
ex)
Children ought to be able to read by the age of 7. |
|
| @wish | Wishful feeling, to wish something is true or has happened |
|
ex)
If only I could remember his name! (~I do wish I could remember his
name!) |
INTENTION
| @insistence | Strong determination to do something |
| ex) He will do it, whatever you say. | |
| @intention | Intention about something or to do something |
|
ex)
He shall get this money. (Speaker’s intention) |
|
| @want | Desire to do something |
| ex) I want to go France. | |
| @will | Determination to do something |
|
ex) I’ll write as soon as I can. |
NECESSITY / OBLIGATION
| @need | Necessity to do something |
|
ex)
You need to finish this work today. |
|
| @obligation | Obligation to do something according to (quasi-) law, contract, or … |
|
ex)
The vendor shall maintain the equipment in good repair. |
|
| @obligation-not | Obligation not to do something, forbid to do something according to (quasi-) law, contract or … |
|
ex)
Cars must not park in front of the entrance. |
|
| @should | To do something as a matter of course |
|
ex)
You should do as he says. |
|
| @unavoidable | Unavoidable feeling of the speaker about doing something |
| ex) I could not help speaking the truth. |
POSSIBILITY
| @certain | Certainty that something is true or happens |
| ex)
If
Peter had the money, he would have bought a car. ex) They should be home by now. |
|
| @inevitable | Logical inevitability that something is true or happens |
| ex) All living things must die. | |
| @may | Practical possibility that something is true or happens |
| ex)
It may be true. ex) It could be. |
|
| @possible | Logical possibility that something is true or happens |
| ex)
Anybody can make mistakes. ex) If Peter had the money, he would buy a car. |
|
| @probable | (Practical) probability that something is true or happens |
| ex)
That would be his mother. ex) He must be lying. |
|
| @rare | Rare
logical possibility that something is true or happens |
| ex)
If such a thing should happen, what shall we do? ex) If I should fail, I will [would] try again. |
|
| @unreal | Unreality that something is true or happens |
| ex)
If we had enough money, we could buy a car. ex) If Peter had the money, he could buy a car. |
EMOTION
| @admire | Admiring feeling of the speaker about something |
| @blame | Blameful feeling of the speaker about something |
| ex) A sailor, and afraid of the sea! | |
| @contempt | Contemptuous feeling of the speaker about something |
| ex)
You never could do it *In Japanese the postpositional particles of “nado”, “nanka” or “nante” as in “kimi nado niha..” can be used to express the contemptuous feeling of the speaker about the target, mainly in a negative sentence |
|
| @regret | Regretful feeling of the speaker about something |
| ex) It's a pity that he should miss such a golden opportunity. | |
| @surprised | Surprised feeling of the speaker about something |
| ex) (He has succeeded!) But that's great! | |
| @troublesome | Troublesome feeling of the speaker about the occurrence of something |
| ex)
My house was [I had my house] broken into.@troublesome yesterday. *There is a troublesome feeling of the speaker when using a passive form of the verb in this case in Japanese. |
Typical UNL structures can be expressed by attributes to avoid the complexity of enconverting and deconverting. What marks are used for enclosing a word or phrase can also be expressed by attributes. The attributes for indicating enclosure must be attached to the scope node of the enclosed phrase if it consists of a (set of) binary relation(s) of UNL.
| @passive | passive form |
| @pl | more than one |
| @angle_bracket | < > are used |
| @brace | { } are used |
| @double_parenthesis | (( )) are used |
| @double_quote | “ ” are used |
| @parenthesis | ( ) are used |
| @single_quote | ‘ ’ are used |
| @square_bracket | [ ] are used |
|
|
| Top UNL Expression Relations Attributes Universal Words UNLKB Knowledge Representation in UNL Logical Expression in UNL UNL System |